New open-access publication “Rethinking diagnostic crossover and recovery in eating disorders”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11019-026-10328-4

With Davide Serpico, University of Milano(first and corresponding author) and Valentina Petrolini, University of Bologna.

Eating Disorders (EDs) raise significant challenges from a diagnostic and nosological perspective. Much of this is due to the extensive overlap among diagnostic criteria, with symptoms being shared by several conditions and subtypes. This nosological uncertainty is further exacerbated by two additional features of EDs, which will be the focus of this paper, namely diagnostic crossover and recovery. First, patients who acquire or lose one or more symptoms over time (symptom shifting) often transition to a new diagnostic category (crossover). Second, researchers working on EDs have recently underscored a problematic lack of inclusion of patients’ perspective on diagnostic and recovery processes, which results in an incomplete understanding of key aspects of EDs. Drawing on theoretical frameworks and concepts from Dynamical Systems Theory and epigenetics, we present a dynamic characterization of EDs that allows us to tackle the challenges of crossover and recovery. In our framework, different conditions represent robust endpoints in individuals’ developmental trajectories that are nonetheless flexible in certain circumstances. Thinking about EDs in diachronic terms also prompts us to significantly reframe our notion of recovery, not so much as the return to health but as the generation of future healthy trajectories, to be pursued in compliance with patients’ self-perception and aims. Indeed, the key role of patients’ values in determining their future trajectories testifies how psychiatric categories are not merely descriptive but constitutive, influencing both self-understanding and clinical practice.

Funding acknowledgments:

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Milano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Davide Serpico’s research for this paper was supported by the PRIN “Normative Kinds: Values and Classificatory Decisions in Science and Policy-making” (Grant n. 2022SYAW7A) and by the Department of Philosophy “Piero Martinetti” of the University of Milan under the Project “Departments of Excellence 2023–2027” issued by the Italian Ministry of University and Research. Valentina Petrolini’s research was supported by the Department of Philosophy of the University of Bologna, through the projects RFO2024_PETROLINI_N6 and RFO2025_PETROLINI_N6. Silvia Camporesi’s research was supported by the PRIN “Normative Kinds: Values and Classificatory Decisions in Science and Policy-making” (Grant n. 2022SYAW7A) for work from October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024, and by the KU Leuven BOFZAP Starting Grant (from October 1 st, 2024 onwards).

Invitation to book launch January 29th 11 am CET “Crisis, Inequity and Legacy: Narrative analyses of the COVID-19 pandemic” (Oxford University Press)

You are warmly invited to the online launch of Oxford University Press edited book ‘Crisis, Inequity and Legacy: Narrative analyses of the COVID-19 pandemic”, on January 29th 2026 at 11 am CET.

The online launch will be chaired by the editors of the book, Prof. Mark Davis, myself, and Dr. Sanny Mulubale, and include contributions from authors as well as from our panelist Dr. Felicitas Sofia Holzer, Senior Researcher, Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich.

The book examines how COVID-19 narratives function as models of sense-making, how they connect public and private life, and what they make possible in social worlds. It emphasizes the little heard stories of those struggling with the pandemic’s effects, featuring stories from across the world found in literature, social research, media, public health, and science. In doing so, it provides insight into the inequitable social burdens associated with the COVID-19 crisis.

Further information about the book can be found here:
https://lnkd.in/dHC_u8sw

Link to register here:
https://shorturl.at/YX50c

All are welcome. Join us to celebrate the book and reflect on research and engagement, post-COVID19.

New research output out with Bianchini “Assistive Technologies, Brain-Computer Interfaces and the Radical Cyborgization of Athletes”

Delighted to see this chapter with Francesco Bianchini, Professor of logic and philosophy of cognitive sciences, University of Bologna, now published for this Routledge volume ‘Artificial Intelligence and Neuroenhancement in sport‘ edited by Alberto Carrio, University Pompeu Fabra, for the series ‘Ethics in Sport’.

Here are a few things we argue in this chapter:

  1. The performance capacities of athletes using assistive technology go generally unchallenged, until their performances begin to approach the current, and necessarily contingent upper human limit, which is determined based on the performance of an athlete without assistive technology.
  2. Sports governing bodies address concerns of unfair advantage from assistive technologies by comparing athletes’ performances to current able-bodied human capabilities. This approach, which we term a ‘strategy of containment’, reflects widespread ableist assumptions in sports. It is a strategy designed to exclude athletes who are perceived as challenging the dominant status of able-bodied competitors.
  3. The integration of AI with assistive technologies could drive an evolution of sports beyond the binary categorisation in able-bodied events and para-events. To this end we first discuss the Cybathlon, which offers the possibility to experiment with radical new functionalities of the body, which go beyond mere restoration to previous functions or augmentation of existing functions. We also discuss brain-computer interfaces (BCI), which may lead to forms of compensation and standardization based on a minimum set of standard characteristics required for a given discipline.
  4. We argue that an inclusive approach to sports which integrates AI with assistive technologies would focus not only on the idea of ‘leveling the playing field’ using the able-bodied human norm as a standard, but rather on comparing athletic aspects and performance elements of AI-integrated assisted technologies using the ‘cyborg’ as the new benchmark for human performance. Ultimately, this could enable able-bodied athletes and those requiring assistive technologies to compete together in a new category of human athletes for whom technology can be read at multiple levels as assistive, optimising, or enhancing.

Browse other great chapters included in this edited volume here!

https://www.routledge.com/Artificial-Intelligence-and-Neuroenhancement-in-Sport/Carrio/p/book/9781032858814