New ‘Conversation’ piece out explaining why the new IOC policy is harming, not protecting, women

I have always considered outreach and public engagement an essential part of my work as an academic.

Even if it doesn’t earn brownie points for promotion, I think it is important that we, as academics, carve out time to communicate what matters most about our work to the wider public.
In times of post-truth, post-expertise, and post-evidence, we need to stay anchored to the values we believe are important.

Now for this piece published in theCONVERSATION I have to thank my great colleagues Marcus Mazzucco and Sarah Teetzel for leading.

For me, the take-home message is simple: alarm bells should ring whenever someone says they want to “protect you.” Even if you don’t agree with our position on the new IOC policy, those alarm bells are still there in plain sight.

Thanks for reading!

https://theconversation.com/the-return-of-sex-testing-in-sport-risks-harming-women-athletes-rather-than-protecting-them-279074

#sextesting #IOC #policy #sexvariations #DSD #eligibility #femalecategory #discrimination #LAGames

New open-access publication “Rethinking diagnostic crossover and recovery in eating disorders”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11019-026-10328-4

With Davide Serpico, University of Milano(first and corresponding author) and Valentina Petrolini, University of Bologna.

Eating Disorders (EDs) raise significant challenges from a diagnostic and nosological perspective. Much of this is due to the extensive overlap among diagnostic criteria, with symptoms being shared by several conditions and subtypes. This nosological uncertainty is further exacerbated by two additional features of EDs, which will be the focus of this paper, namely diagnostic crossover and recovery. First, patients who acquire or lose one or more symptoms over time (symptom shifting) often transition to a new diagnostic category (crossover). Second, researchers working on EDs have recently underscored a problematic lack of inclusion of patients’ perspective on diagnostic and recovery processes, which results in an incomplete understanding of key aspects of EDs. Drawing on theoretical frameworks and concepts from Dynamical Systems Theory and epigenetics, we present a dynamic characterization of EDs that allows us to tackle the challenges of crossover and recovery. In our framework, different conditions represent robust endpoints in individuals’ developmental trajectories that are nonetheless flexible in certain circumstances. Thinking about EDs in diachronic terms also prompts us to significantly reframe our notion of recovery, not so much as the return to health but as the generation of future healthy trajectories, to be pursued in compliance with patients’ self-perception and aims. Indeed, the key role of patients’ values in determining their future trajectories testifies how psychiatric categories are not merely descriptive but constitutive, influencing both self-understanding and clinical practice.

Funding acknowledgments:

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Milano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Davide Serpico’s research for this paper was supported by the PRIN “Normative Kinds: Values and Classificatory Decisions in Science and Policy-making” (Grant n. 2022SYAW7A) and by the Department of Philosophy “Piero Martinetti” of the University of Milan under the Project “Departments of Excellence 2023–2027” issued by the Italian Ministry of University and Research. Valentina Petrolini’s research was supported by the Department of Philosophy of the University of Bologna, through the projects RFO2024_PETROLINI_N6 and RFO2025_PETROLINI_N6. Silvia Camporesi’s research was supported by the PRIN “Normative Kinds: Values and Classificatory Decisions in Science and Policy-making” (Grant n. 2022SYAW7A) for work from October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024, and by the KU Leuven BOFZAP Starting Grant (from October 1 st, 2024 onwards).

Invitation to book launch January 29th 11 am CET “Crisis, Inequity and Legacy: Narrative analyses of the COVID-19 pandemic” (Oxford University Press)

You are warmly invited to the online launch of Oxford University Press edited book ‘Crisis, Inequity and Legacy: Narrative analyses of the COVID-19 pandemic”, on January 29th 2026 at 11 am CET.

The online launch will be chaired by the editors of the book, Prof. Mark Davis, myself, and Dr. Sanny Mulubale, and include contributions from authors as well as from our panelist Dr. Felicitas Sofia Holzer, Senior Researcher, Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich.

The book examines how COVID-19 narratives function as models of sense-making, how they connect public and private life, and what they make possible in social worlds. It emphasizes the little heard stories of those struggling with the pandemic’s effects, featuring stories from across the world found in literature, social research, media, public health, and science. In doing so, it provides insight into the inequitable social burdens associated with the COVID-19 crisis.

Further information about the book can be found here:
https://lnkd.in/dHC_u8sw

Link to register here:
https://shorturl.at/YX50c

All are welcome. Join us to celebrate the book and reflect on research and engagement, post-COVID19.