Tag Archives: Danielle Mercado

New line of research with Danielle Mercado on sport-specific values and norms underlying disordered eating behaviours

I am very pleased to announce the first output of a new line of research with Danielle Mercado, PhD candidate in Biomedical Ethics and Law at KU Leuven and MAiSI alumna, in collaboration with Prof. Laurence Claes and Dr Olivia Howe.

As part of her PhD project in Sports Medicine and Ethics, Danielle is investigating elite athletes’ perspectives and subjective, values with the aim to understand which factors may contribute to the development of disordered eating disorders, and/or possibly constitute a barriers to help-seeking, diagnosis and treatment in this population.

The first research output resulting from Danielle’s PhD project is a scoping review on ‘Sport-Specific Factors and Values Leading to Normalisation of Disordered Eating Behaviours in Elite Sport’, published for the European Eating Disorder Review. Link here:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42604599

and abstract below.

For access to the full paper please send a request to: silvia.camporesi@kuleuven.be, or to: danielle.mercado@kuleuven.be

Stay tuned for more research outputs from Danielle Mercado in this space, with a particular focus on cycling in Belgium.

#eatingdisorders #disorderedeatingbehaviours #sport #values #norms #sport #cycling

Abstract

Background: Disordered eating behaviours (DEBs) can be normalised by elite sports values and norms, obscuring risk for DEBs.

Objectives: This scoping review mapped (1) how DEBs are conceptualised in elite sport, (2) the values, norms, and institutional mechanisms that normalise them, and (3) the barriers that obstruct recognition and care.

Methods: The search was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, encompassing eight databases with no date limits. A protocol was registered; 3497 records were screened (1153 duplicates were removed), 283 full texts were reviewed, and 128 studies were included.

Results: Study designs are largely crosssectional, based on self-report, and variably specific to particular sports. (1) DEBs are framed as a continuum ranging from functional practices to pathology, with tipping points linked to seasonality, injury and selection processes. (2) Normalisation mechanisms of DEBs stem from sports-specific values and norms, constituting an elite sporting ethic, body ideals, coach/team culture, institutional surveillance and public/media scrutiny. (3) Barriers for assessment and help-seeking include the moralisation of restrictive behaviours, stigma, ‘toughness’ norms, knowledge gaps, coach gatekeeping, organisational constraints and gendered assumptions.

Conclusions: System-level safeguards are needed and athlete-centred, protective initiatives should be prioritised over performance-oriented outcomes. Future research should prioritise longitudinal designs, elite sports-sensitive measures, and equity-oriented sampling.

Keywords: disordered eating; disordered eating in sport; eating disorders; elite level pressures; elite sport culture; normalisation; values.

Announcing the winners of the 2024 British Philosophy of Sport McNamee Student Essay Prize

We are delighted to announce the winners of the 2024 BPSA McNamee Essay Prize.

This year we received an exceptionally high number of strong submissions and we would like to express our deep gratitude to all the applicants for their interest and contribution to the philosophy and ethics of sport.

After careful consideration the jury, comprised by Prof. Alfred Archer (BPSA Chair), Prof. Silvia Camporesi (BPSA Deputy Chair), and Prof. Sandra Meeuwsen, has awarded the following prizes and commendations:

1st prize goes to Danielle Mercado for an essay titled “Navigating the Tension: Balancing Egalitarianism and Elitism in the Paralympic Movement”.

Danielle Mercado recently graduated with a Master’s degree in Sports Ethics and Integrity from the Erasmus Mundus programme hosted by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Danielle’s main area of interest is Paralympic Studies. Danielle has worked with a number of organisations, including Athletics Integrity Unit and the Special Olympics Philippines, to promote integrity and safeguarding in sport.

The 2nd prize on equal merit goes to Xiner Tao for an essay titled “Is the display of “unwillingness to fight” against sportsmanship”,  and to Lucas Contador Dourado da Silva for an essay titled “Failure as a Renunciation of Enjoyment: an Interpretation of Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Discourse”.

Xiner Tao (also known as Mia) is an alumna of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degree in Sports Ethics and Integrity. She is currently pursuing her PhD in the Philosophy of Sport at Tilburg University, Netherlands, where she focuses on the meanings and values of sport.

Lucas Contador Dourado da Silva is a PhD candidate at the Physical Education School (Faculdade de Educação Física – FEF)/Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Brazil.

Commendations go to Ke (Aria) Gong for an essay titled “Integrity exists not only in the game: an analysis of tennis governing bodies’ handling of Alexander Zverev’s domestic abuse allegations, and to Tommaso Ropelato for an essay titled “Reimaging talent: how genetic enhancement could shape the future of sports”.

Ke (Aria) Gong is currently in the second year of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master of Arts in Sports Ethics and Integrity (MAiSI) program, pursuing her research interests in gender equity and safeguarding in sports.

Tommaso Ropelato is a PhD candidate in philosophical and religious studies at Università degli Studi di Torino. As one of the Horizon Europe Young Ambassadors 2022, Tommaso is also passionate about creating and disseminating scientific knowledge that can inform and inspire Responsible Innovation for a better future.

The winner and runner ups will present their work at the BPSA online seminar series.

Stay tuned on:

http://philosophyofsport.org.uk/seminars/